I’m sitting in a hotel lobby this week writing posts. If you noticed last week the pitch was about Hotwire and Priceline. I was trying to book a trip. I was determined to find something good and didn’t want to take the risk with either of those websites. However, I just gave into it and booked something on the sites. I ended up at a pretty nice hotel in downtown St. Louis.

However, when I went to look at reviews on the internet about the hotel, the reviews were all bad. Some were bad for no reason, some were bad because the reviewer actually had a bad experience.

Now, here’s the problem I am having with places that have been reviewed on the internet, this particulary pertains to places on trip, hotel, and food review sites: People are more likely to complain than report a satisfactory experience. I am guilty of it: a lot of times, I end up writing about when something makes me angry or I am unhappy with a situation.

You will always have a few people who are going to report on how the situation was regardless of whether or not the experience was good; but more often people will complain than brag. Honestly, the entire situation isn’t very fair to the establishments.

For example, the hotel I’m staying at has particularly bad reviews. I believe on Yelp, this hotel is rated a 2 out of 5, which is not very good at all. It all has to do with the fact that there isn’t wireless internet for free in the rooms (which is stated on the hotel’s website and is fairly common knowledge in my opinion), parking isn’t free (but there aren’t many places in the downtown area that hae free parking), and the bathrooms are small.

I believe that most places should be given a fair chance and that you can’t go by what all the reviews are.

Apple has a serious downfall when it comes to their iphone and software development kit or sdk for those in the know. The problem with the ingenious design is the fact that the “apps” are only accessible once the app is approved by Apple and designated.

Don’t even get me started on the Google Voice fiasco that just happened and landed Apple in some hot water with the FCC….

Now the iphone application store has rejected a new application because the application allows the reading of the Karma Sutra. It is to be noted that the book reader Eucalyptus does not come with any books, but the K.S. is available for download onto devices and could be read at another time.

Whether it be the fact that Apple’s development team may decide that your application isn’t good enough for their devices or good enough to be released to their “cloud,” there are different places for software developers to go to have their programs viewed by many.

Apple has also been thinking of releasing a “net book” also. I suppose the net book would run like net books that run on Windows or Linux and are just able to run simple programs or surf the internet. Apple would undoubtedly make a net book that would be impossible to make programs for and far less powerful than any of the current mac books that are out there today.

The mac/pc commercials make me so mad because the pc just gives up when “the Megan” asks for a computer that doesn’t have software issues like crashing or viruses. Well guess what “Megan,” Mac’s have all those same problems too. As a matter of fact, I have been on a Mac many times in the past and gotten their version of a blue screen of death. I mean the iMac may have been the worst personal computer I have ever used, however there are so many people who think that the Macintosh name and product line is the best thing that has ever happened to the computer industry.

Whatever the reason, I think that people will enjoy PC’s and Windows mobile, Android, WebOS, and Symbian phones for much longer once the novelty of the iPhone wears off (like everyone knows it will).

Credit makes the world go around it appears, at least in our capitalistic nation. It seems these days there isn’t much that you can do without it; including getting that job you’ve been so desperately searching for.

It might sound crazy to you, because it definitely sounds fairly insane to me, but when you apply for a job and agree to a background check, the potential employer can also check your credit history. To me, this is not any potential employer’s business. What credit follies I may have made in the past I am obviously trying to rectify by getting a job and it will be very difficult for me to fix anything without a job.

Thanks to a steadily declining job market, credit scores are on the decline. People are getting behind on credit card payments, going into foreclosure, and filing for bankruptcy protection. So finding a job with a bad credit score is a double edged sword.

According to those who are for the credit score check prior to hiring an employee money problems could mean that the person has a disorder in their life that could lead to poor work habits, including employee theft. These same people said that those with great credit histories are less likely to have poor work habits and be trustworthy as well as reliable.

I, as well as some experts, think there is no clear link between a credit score and history and the job that an individual can do. I am not saying that there is something wrong with having a pristine credit history, just that you can’t count out those who don’t. Credit reports simply don’t account for layoffs, the overall economic conditions regarding unemployment, and things like medical bills or identity theft.

There is someone I know who is the best person with money. He actually is the biggest saver I’ve ever met. Unfortunately, through a couple of bad business deals and poor judgments of character, this man’s credit fell to a very low number. These kinds of things stay on your credit report for seven years for the most part. Think about it, if you can start your credit history when you’re 18, do you think you’re the same person at 25? How about the difference between 23 and 30?

I think that if an employer is going to check an applicant’s credit history, perhaps he or she should give the applicant the chance to explain blemishes on their credit report rather than just judging that applicant for things that may be nearly a decade old. Even though I would still not agree with the practice, I think that this would at least give the applicant a chance to explain the situation instead of just being thought of as a “bad prospect” to a potential employer.