Is a newspaper subscription necessary?
Jennifer McClelland | RSS | 0 Comments
The Wall Street Times is one of the largest newspapers in the country. It has subscribers from all walks of life from coast to coast. However, are those readers actually getting out of the newspaper what they were looking for in the beginning?
I honestly don’t think so.
In today’s times there isn’t a real reason to have a subscription to a newspaper at all. You can get your news from the internet or 24 hour cable news. The news on regular non-cable television is even on for hours a day now. People are becoming increasingly aware of the move to a more digital form of the news.
There is a downside of the news becoming completely digital; print journalists are losing their jobs. Newspapers all across the country are going out of business and while newspapers like the Wall Street Journal don’t seem to be doing too badly right now, they have had to begin charging for information on its website to make up for the amount of readers its losing in subscriptions.
The good thing for the newspapers is that they aren’t having to pay as much for printing services and publishing services simply because they don’t need the same amount of supplies.
Overall, I feel as though newspapers in their current print form will likely become more and more scarce. I think that local newspapers will hurt the worst and many will go out of business altogether.
Related posts:The fall of the newspaper and why no one needs a subscription
Rupert Murdoch doesn’t want his sites to be listed in search engines anymore
Tags: cable television, downside, printing services

