You know Wall Street executive pay is too high when…

Jennifer McClelland | RSS | Thu, Nov 12 2009 | 0 Comments

There are plenty of people across the country as well as around the world who have something to say about the United States economy and Wall Street. The two have been skipping down the recession highway hand-in-hand for the past year and everyone sees it.

Executive pay is one of the things that gets a lot of people particularly fired up and you really know that the executives are making too much money when Bill Gates says they are.

Gates had this to say, “It was a bad milestone in controlling executive salaries when that $1 million cap went on. The compensation problem is a very interesting problem. I do think compensation is often too high, but it’s a very tough problem to solve.”

The cap he is talking about is a $1 million cap in executive pay that went into effect in 1993. Since the cap was put in place, companies have found other ways of showering their executives with gifts and other things such as lucrative stock options. The stock options were often worth FAR more than a year’s salary at one of the companies would have been.

The $1 million limit on salaries encouraged companies to instead give executives lucrative stock options, sending pay to vast new heights.

Gates also worries about the government’s control of AIG, “I do worry that when the government owns an entity like AIG that you can greatly devalue that entity by having it essentially have to behave as though it is part of the government. It is an unnatural situation when the government owns a lot of a private company. Unfortunately there is a view that it should exist for a long term. There is some devaluation of what that asset would have been worth if it hadn’t had to go through that kind of management structure. It is unavoidable.”

Bill Gates is one of the people who benefit from lucrative stock options with his company (which he stepped down from to focus on philanthropy). However, I do not see Microsoft taking down the entire United States economy like the banking industry did.

Source

Related posts:
American banking CEOs simply make too much money

Tags: banking industry, microsoft, lucrative stock options

Banks that were too big to fail are now bigger?

Jennifer McClelland | RSS | Mon, Aug 31 2009 | 0 Comments

The banks that were supposedly too large to fail last year when the government decided to bail out crumbling banks are now bigger than they were just a year ago. Even with measures in place to try to keep banks from getting too large, somehow these banks have gotten bigger and continue to grow.

J.P. Morgan Chase holds more than $1 out of every single $10 deposit made in the United States. Big surprise, so does Bank of America and Wells Fargo. Along with Citigroup, these banks issue half of the mortgages in the country and two out of every three credit cards.

FDIC chairman Sheila C. Bair has said regarding the weight of the banks on the financial system, “It is at the top of the list of things that need to be fixed. It fed the crisis and it has gotten worse because of the crisis.”

A few problems with these banks being bigger than they once were is that:
1) Consumers will have less choice when it comes to banking services and these banks will likely take advantage of that situation.
2) The bigger the bank, the more likely it is to think that the government will prop it up if things start to go south. This could lead to more risky moves on the banks’ parts.
3) The government’s stakes in these companies is large, but it still does not have voting shares.

Of course, this all came about due to banks failing or otherwise being “too good of a deal to pass up.” Meaning, that banks like Wachovia were simply too cheap with too large of a customer base to not purchase. That’s what Wells Fargo did, and that’s what has been happening all across the banking industry. However, it does seem a bit counter productive when you start to think about it.

These banks were once too large to fail and nothing has changed it seems. The only difference is that every dollar banks are lending is being scrutinized and those who want to borrow money to buy homes or other things are also being scrutinized as hard as the banks are in some situations.

Image Source

Related posts:
As more small banks fail, the FDIC is hurting
Nine banks went out of business on Friday
Wells Fargo’s profit nearly doubles in the third quarter

Tags: bank of america, consumers, citigroup