All Posts Tagged With: "consumers"
Consumer confidence drops for October
Jennifer McClelland | RSS | Wed, Oct 28 2009 | 0 Comments
The Consumer Board released October’s Consumer Confidence Index number today and it was below what anyone was expecting. It fell to 47.7 for the month which is the Board’s second lowest reading since May.
to put the number into perspective; a number higher than 90 means that the economy is doing well and anything above 100 says that there is strong growth in the economy. The lowest that the Consumer Board has ever measured was the record low of 25.3 in February 2009. It only took a few months to climb back up to 53.4 last month.
The reason that consumer confidence is so important is because it is the number that tells how much consumers are spending on items. Because spending on these items accounts for 70% of the United States economy (according to the government), it is an important economic indicator.
So, what does a drop in the consumer confidence index number mean? It shows that consumers have a grim outlook of the future.
According to Lynn Franco, the director of the Conference Board’s Consumer Research Center, “Consumers also remain quite pessimistic about their future earnings, a sentiment that will likely constrain spending during the holidays.”
This news is not welcomed by the retailers in the country. Last year, spending around the holidays fell to levels not seen since the 1960’s. With so many retailers across the United States still hurting and struggling and also going out of business, many of them are counting on this holiday season to prop them up and maybe put them in the black for the year.
The Consumer Board gets the Consumer Confidence Index by sending surveys to 5,000 homes across the country. For October’s numbers, the cutoff date was October 21st.
I honestly think all the figures and indexes like this put people into worry-mode. When people are truly worried about their jobs and their finances they don’t spend. For the past couple of months, people have been worried about their income even with plenty of job security. Jobs aren’t being lost at the rate that they were and there are plenty of places where people are working and not having to worry whether or not their job will be there the next day.
The Consumer Confidence Index was something that we didn’t have before the 60’s and it seems as though the country’s consumer spending was not that bad through the 50’s (after WWII anyway).
What do you think about the Consumer Confidence Index and any of the other financial indexes that come out telling you how the economy is doing? Are there any of these indicators that you follow to tell you how things are going?
I believe I would follow the unemployment numbers a bit more closely than this one.
Source
Retail numbers were positive for October
The U.S. saw another 284,000 jobs lost in October
Tags: going out of business, consumer confidence index, consumers
Today’s Ebook – ID Theft: What It’s All About
Chris McClelland | RSS | Fri, Oct 09 2009 | 0 CommentsToday’s featured ebook download is ID Theft: What It’s All About (611 KB, 36 pg) – A small information pamphlet from the FTC that details how thieves can steal your personal information and use it to commit fraud for long periods without your knowledge. Here’s how to protect yourself, and what to do if you are a victim.
What you can learn from this ebook
In the course of a busy day, you may write a check at the grocery store, charge tickets to a ball game, rent a car, mail your tax returns, change service providers for your cell phone, or apply for a credit card. In each transaction, you reveal bits of personal information, like your bank and credit card account numbers; your income; your Social Security number (SSN); or your name, address, and phone numbers a goldmine of information for an identity thief. Once a thief has that information, it can be used without your knowledge to commit fraud or theft.
Identity theft is a serious crime. People whose identities have been stolen can spend time and money cleaning up the mess the thieves have made of their good name and credit record. They may lose out on job opportunities, and loans for education, housing, or cars. They may even get arrested for crimes they didn’t commit.
Can you prevent an identity theft? As with any crime, you cannot completely control whether you will become a victim. But according to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the nation’s consumer protection agency, you can minimize your risk by managing your personal information cautiously.
To download this ebook, or any of our current ebooks, please visit the ebook page where you may choose the ebook(s) you wish to download. *Download an ebook by clicking on it’s title.* Related posts:
Today’s Ebook – Identity Theft and Your Social Security Number
Today’s Ebook – Identity Theft
Today’s Ebook – Phishing and Pharming: Helping Consumers Avoid Internet Fraud
Tags: social security number, consumers, Today's Ebook - ID Theft: What It’s All About
The airlines have decided to gouge you during the holidays this year.
Jennifer McClelland | RSS | Tue, Sep 29 2009 | 2 Comments
It looks like the airlines are at it again. They are really wanting to get any money that they can from you, the flyer, whenever and however they can. They pull dirty, sneaky tricks and expect consumers to just fall for them or accept them as the way it is. However, it kind of is “just the way it is” because I think in the United States, we have become accustomed to being kicked around by the airline industry.
So, what have the airlines done this time? Well, they have decided, all within hours of each other, to start charging an extra $10 per ticket if you decide you want to fly during the busiest travel days of the year.
The $10 charge that the airlines are imposing will be in the form of a “miscellaneous surcharge” that will be added to all the tickets that are for the days of November 29th, January 2nd, and January 3rd. The four airlines that have all decided to go this route are American Airlines, Delta, Northwest, and U.S. Airways.
Of course U.S. Airways has decided to take part in a new kind of charge. This is the same company that keeps increasing its baggage fees and even charges you an extra $5 if you want to check-in your baggage at the desk in the airport. That is outrageous in my honest opinion. When I was in Maryland for my cousin’s wedding in July, I asked my uncle if I could use his computer to print out my check-in information and when I told him that it would cost me an extra $5 if I waited until I got to the airport he looked at me and said, “Wow…that’s outrageous.”
So, when you go shopping for those plane tickets for this holiday season, remember that not only will you be paying extra for checked baggage, but now you also have to consider this new fee. That means when you’re looking at Orbitz or wherever you go to buy your tickets, the price that you’re seeing is not the price that you will pay. In some instances, your ticket will cost $30 or more than what the internet says. At least that is my understand of how this fee will work.
My guess is that the airlines don’t want to give you an upfront quote due to the fact that the lower price they actually see on the website will draw some customers in who are simply looking for the cheapest fare.
No related posts.
Tags: airline industry, sneaky tricks, american airlines
The job market might start to get better in the next 5 years.
Jennifer McClelland | RSS | Tue, Sep 08 2009 | 2 Comments
The new data from the United States Department of Labor was released recently and the outlook for recovery in the job market is a bit depressing. The data suggests it will take many years for the labor market to fully recover to the level it was before the recession. This is even if the economy is turning around.
Unemployment rose to 9.7% in August which equates to 14.9 million people who are out of work and are currently looking for a job. The unemployment rate of 9.7% is the total population, when you divide that number into populations such as teenagers the number can vary greatly. The unemployment rate for teenagers is around 26%.
What is going wrong with the system right now is that to keep up with population increase and other natural increases, 125,000 jobs have to be created every month to keep up. Currently, we’re still losing jobs every month. Even though we’re losing jobs at a much slower rate than earlier this year, we’re still not gaining any ground.
Here are some figures from MSNBC and the Department of Labor about the current economy and unemployment:
Related posts:2014: The year Moody’s Economy.com predicts the unemployment rate will finally dip toward 5 percent, considered to be the “normal” level.
7.4 million: The number of jobs lost since the recession started.
24.9 weeks: The average duration that unemployed workers are out of a job, the highest level since the Department of Labor started tracking the figure in 1948.
4.98 million: The number of people unemployed longer than 27 weeks, also the highest level since World War II, although the growth in the size of the labor market over time contributes to that.
9 million: The number of workers forced to take part-time jobs who would rather work more hours.
25.5 percent: The unemployment rate among teenagers, the highest level on record since 1948, breaking the previous high of 24.1 set in 1982.
10.1 percent: The unemployment rate for men over age 20.
7.6 percent: The unemployment rate for women over age 20.
8.9 percent: The unemployment rate for white workers over 16 years old, short of the record 9.7 percent from 1982.
15.1 percent: The unemployment rate for black workers over 16 years old, far short of the record 21.2 percent from 1983.
13 percent: The unemployment rate for Latino workers over 16 years old, short of the record 15.7 hit in 1982.
1.4 million: The number of construction jobs lost since December 2007 as the housing crisis intensified.
65,000: The number of construction jobs lost in August, mostly in nonresidential and heavy construction.
537,000: The number of financial sector jobs lost since the recession began, including 28,000 shed in August.
829,000: The number of retail jobs lost since the recession started and consumers pulled back spending, including 10,000 lost in August.
544,000: The net increase in health care jobs since the recession began, with 28,000 being added in August.
2.6 percent: The rise in average hourly earnings over the last year, with a boost of 6 cents in August bringing the average to $18.65.
0.8 percent: The smaller increase in overall weekly earnings over the last year, which was held back by workers getting fewer hours.
Unemployment rate increases to 10.2%
The Job Market is Quite Tough.
Tags: unemployed workers, average hourly earnings, recession
Banks that were too big to fail are now bigger?
Jennifer McClelland | RSS | Mon, Aug 31 2009 | 0 Comments
The banks that were supposedly too large to fail last year when the government decided to bail out crumbling banks are now bigger than they were just a year ago. Even with measures in place to try to keep banks from getting too large, somehow these banks have gotten bigger and continue to grow.
J.P. Morgan Chase holds more than $1 out of every single $10 deposit made in the United States. Big surprise, so does Bank of America and Wells Fargo. Along with Citigroup, these banks issue half of the mortgages in the country and two out of every three credit cards.
FDIC chairman Sheila C. Bair has said regarding the weight of the banks on the financial system, “It is at the top of the list of things that need to be fixed. It fed the crisis and it has gotten worse because of the crisis.”
A few problems with these banks being bigger than they once were is that:
1) Consumers will have less choice when it comes to banking services and these banks will likely take advantage of that situation.
2) The bigger the bank, the more likely it is to think that the government will prop it up if things start to go south. This could lead to more risky moves on the banks’ parts.
3) The government’s stakes in these companies is large, but it still does not have voting shares.
Of course, this all came about due to banks failing or otherwise being “too good of a deal to pass up.” Meaning, that banks like Wachovia were simply too cheap with too large of a customer base to not purchase. That’s what Wells Fargo did, and that’s what has been happening all across the banking industry. However, it does seem a bit counter productive when you start to think about it.
These banks were once too large to fail and nothing has changed it seems. The only difference is that every dollar banks are lending is being scrutinized and those who want to borrow money to buy homes or other things are also being scrutinized as hard as the banks are in some situations.
Related posts:As more small banks fail, the FDIC is hurting
Nine banks went out of business on Friday
Wells Fargo’s profit nearly doubles in the third quarter
Tags: wells fargo, banking industry, fdic chairman

