All Posts Tagged With: "journalists"
The fall of the newspaper and why no one needs a subscription
Jennifer McClelland | RSS | Thu, Oct 29 2009 | 3 Comments
The Wall Street Times is one of the largest newspapers in the country. It has subscribers from all walks of life from coast to coast. However, are those readers actually getting out of the newspaper what they were looking for in the beginning?
I honestly don’t think so.
In today’s times there isn’t a real reason to have a subscription to a newspaper at all. You can get your news from the internet or 24 hour cable news. The news on regular non-cable television is even on for hours a day now. People are becoming increasingly aware of the move to a more digital form of the news.
There is a downside of the news becoming completely digital; print journalists are losing their jobs. Newspapers all across the country are going out of business and while newspapers like the Wall Street Journal don’t seem to be doing too badly right now, they have had to begin charging for information on its website to make up for the amount of readers its losing in subscriptions.
The good thing for the newspapers is that they aren’t having to pay as much for printing services and publishing services simply because they don’t need the same amount of supplies.
Overall, I feel as though newspapers in their current print form will likely become more and more scarce. I think that many local newspapers will hurt the worst and many will go out of business altogether.
As funny as it may seem, in the past few weeks (contrary to exactly how I feel) another print newspaper has been showing up in my town of 20,000. I completely did not expect for there to be another print newspaper here ever. With three local newspapers/publications in the county, the market is over covered.
No related posts.
Tags: cable news, journalists, real reason
Boston Globe resumes talks with union
Jennifer McClelland | RSS | Tue, May 05 2009 | 1 CommentThe New York Times Co., owner of the Boston Globe, will resume negotiations with the Boston Newspaper Guild, the paper’s largest union (it represents about 700 editorial, advertising and business employees), in hopes to reach a deal to keep the paper afloat. Talks are set to resume today at 5 p.m.
The New York Times Co., is trying to get the union to make $20 million in concessions. So far it has been able to reach agreements with six unions, but the Boston Newspaper Guild is holding out.
If they can’t reach an agreement, the New York Times Co. has threatened to shut the Boston Globe down.
Looking at how many journalists are losing their jobs, especially print journalists, I can’t understand why the union wouldn’t want to negotiate with the Times. If the paper is shut down, everyone at the paper will be without a job, and I’m sure that is not what the Boston Newspaper Guild is trying to do.
Related posts:The fall of the newspaper and why no one needs a subscription
Tags: new york times co, concessions, new york times

