All Posts Tagged With: "michael arrington"


Facebook has to clarify its ad policy thanks to companies like Offerpal

 Jennifer McClelland | RSS | Fri, Nov 06 2009 | 0 Comments

offerpal

I am not a huge fan of Offerpal, it likely has something to do with the fact that I, at one point in time, enjoyed playing Farmville. In order to earn “farm cash” you had to either fill out surveys or give the game money. The last time I tried to fill out the surveys (no, I never gave them my cell phone number or anything except for an email address I use for spam anyway) I waited and waited and never got the “farm cash” I was promised. Since that day, I haven’t played Farmville.

This practice has made a lot of people on the site angry, including editor at TechCrunch Michael Arrington, who has gone after the CEO of Offerpal to get some explanation about the company’s ethics.

Facebook posted in its blog about its ad policies and how it polices ads on the site.

The blog said, “Our policies are clear. If you’re an ad network and don’t comply with them, you are doing a disservice to your customers, and you should expect your business opportunities on Facebook to cease. The underlying issues here are bigger than ads. They’re about building an experience that users will want to come back to …no spam, no surprises.”

I completely agree with Facebook here, but I do believe that it should do something to keep spammy ad networks off the site (otherwise it will begin to look less like Facebook and start getting a reputation more along the lines of Myspace). Myspace is full of spammy ads that Facebook, so far, has steered clear of for the most part.

The ad networks used to get the “premiums” in the games like Farmville, Mafia Wars, etc. are all pretty spammy and unless someone really knows what they’re doing when they “sign up” for an “offer” or fill out some kind of quiz, then they could end up being charged for the premium services on their cell phones or other ways.

Related posts:
Facebook continues to beat Twitter about its social networking head
Is Facebook a social “superpower”?

Tags: , ,


Google to buy Twitter??

 Jennifer McClelland | RSS | Sat, Apr 04 2009 | 2 Comments

This week the blog-o-sphere was clashing about opinions of Google buying out Twitter. While some may say it’s a bad thing, I think that it could make Twitter better (or at least more useful).

TechCrunch proprietor Michael Arrington, citing three unnamed sources, said on Thursday night that Google would pay for Twitter in cash, stock or a combination of the two.

The companies are also considering working together on a new search engine, he wrote.
Story continues below ?advertisement | your ad here

Hours after Arrington’s blog entry, Kara Swisher reported on her Boomtown blog said the story was inaccurate, citing “a number of sources.”

“In fact, Twitter and Google have simply been engaged in ’some product-related discussions,’ according to one source,” Swisher wrote.

I know that I write a lot about Twitter, but I still can’t understand why some people want to use it. Someone commented on the last post I wrote about Twitter with a YouTube video that basically sums up exactly how I feel about it.

Related posts:
Google and Microsoft both have deals with Twitter?
Using Twitter as a marketing tool.
Facebook continues to beat Twitter about its social networking head

Tags: , ,

XML Sitemap