Pop Culture’s Lessons in Recession

Jennifer McClelland | RSS | Mon, Nov 30 2009 | 2 Comments

It looks like the recession has made its way into pop culture. HBO has a new series called “Hung” and in its premier recently, it showed scenes of Detroit factories that were abandoned and had a voiceover talking of how the city has now fallen. The series focuses on a man named Ray Drecker, a guy that many can relate to these days.

Drecker was a star athlete in his younger days and is now having a hard time; he is divorced, behind on bills, and lost his job as a high school football coach because of some budget cuts the school had to perform.

The recession is going into its second year and the economy has found its way into pop culture; movies and tv shows have altered their scripts to put the tones of the recession in the stories. Also, plenty of books are offering frugal ideas and tips.

Long running tv shows like the Simpsons have also started talking about the recession. In one episode Homer and Marge have to sell their house because their mortgage payment had gone through the roof. On 30 Rock the characters had to deal with budget cuts. Even the kids from South Park had to learn a lesson about the recession.

Barry Ritholtz, author of Bailout Nation, said, “On the one hand, it’s good when it becomes part of popular culture because people are talking about it and thinking about it, But on the other hand, it’s bad when people are obsessing about it to the point of absurdity.”

In past downturns, the recession has been a way to escape from the problems, but this time, it seems as though pop culture wants to immerse itself in the current situations everyone is facing.

If you look back to shows like Dynasty, in the 1980’s the show was very popular and featured people with a very flamboyant lifestyle where they would flaunt their money. They also thrived during the 1980’s recession.

During the Great Depression big musicals also became very popular.

“If you’ve got a loved one dying of cancer, you may not want to watch, as your entertainment, movies of loved ones dying of cancer,” Thompson said.

I don’t necessarily enjoy watching people suffer in a recession, but I do really like to know that other people, even those in television shows, feel the same way that everyone else does. It makes me feel like Hollywood is connected to the real world and that at least the writers understand what is going on with the average American.

Art is supposed to imitate life I thought. This would be the best way to do so. People want to find solace, this is not a cancer.

Related posts:
5 things the recession put an end to
Well, at least Google is seeing an end to the “advertising” recession

Tags: mortgage payment, homer and marge, high school football

The English population is expected to increase; housing will follow

Jennifer McClelland | RSS | Wed, Nov 11 2009 | 0 Comments

Research by Communities and Local Government says that the population of England is going to increase from 50.8 million to 60.4 million by 2031. There is also a projected increase of one person households. It is expected to increase by 60.3%. In 2006, the number of one person households in England was 6.8 million, the 2031 projection is now 10.9 million.

With an increase of 9.7 million people, there will have to be more room for them. The good news is that since 1938, the number of houses in the country has increased greatly; it has grown from 10.6 million homes in 1938 to 22.2 million as of March 2007. In 1938 people weren’t buying a lot of the homes; there were only 32% that were owner occupied, there are now 70% that are.

Over the past decade, there has been a huge increase in the number of homes built in the country to keep up with demand. It has been seeing an increase in homes between 121,000 and 207,000 every year since 1998. However, with the recent recession, that figure has dropped and between 2008 and 2009, there was only 108,000 built.

Another problem that has been happening in the recession is that the number of vacant houses has also increased. Between April 2007 and April 2008 the number of vacant private homes increased by 26,000.

It appears as though in England, that as the recession has gone on, more and more people are renting instead of buying homes. It may have more to do with the actual cost of ownership than the recession though. In 1990, the average price of a home was 63,000 pounds. It increased to 196,000 pounds just 19 years later. When people are losing their jobs left and right, they simply can’t afford such an expense every month. Not to mention, the true cost of ownership of a home is not only reflected in the monthly mortgage payment but also in the cost of repairs to the house. Things like replacing appliances and fixing plumbing is something that a homeowner has to worry about replacing or fixing on their own dime rather than expecting a landlord to fix these things.

With the number of people that England is expected to accommodate in the next 20 years, there will likely be even more rentals in the country; particularly with single person households. Also, I can expect that housing prices will not go down in the country thanks to the very limited amount of space in the more urban areas.

In the United States, the population is also expected to explode in the next 20 years and housing prices are expected to steadily, but not rapidly, increase over the time frame. Of course, there will be urban areas where bubbles will form and housing prices in those areas will be more expensive than other areas, but over all the national average will likely increase steadily.

Source

Related posts:
Housing Prices See an Increase In the DC Area
Housing prices are on the decline nationwide

Tags: recession, person households, landlord

Perhaps I don’t understand the frustration…

Jennifer McClelland | RSS | Mon, Sep 21 2009 | 0 Comments

Alright, I am a supporter of a public option for government sponsored health insurance. This may make me a “bad guy” to the conservatives of the country but I truly don’t understand what is wrong with wanting an option to have government sponsored health insurance that I PAY for.

Currently, I can’t afford car insurance, my mortgage payment, my student loan payments, AND health insurance so something has to go. Sure, I had a bout of bad luck when I had to have my gallbladder removed a few months ago, but other than that I have not had any troubles with my health.

I would really like to have some form of health insurance and I honestly don’t think that those who have insurance through their employer really understand how much it can cost for the rest of us. Even without a preexisting condition, the cost per month can be $150 with a $5,000 – $10,000 deductible. That is outrageous considering car insurance costs me $80 per month for FULL coverage with a $500 deductible AND I’ve had a car accident that was deemed my fault in the last 3 years.

I wish I did not have to pay that much for health insurance. Over the course of a year, if I did not have to pay over $1,200 for health related costs then I would be ahead over paying for health insurance (if I were paying $100 per month for insurance). Then again, if something disastrous were to happen, then I would be up “that” creek without a paddle (if you know what I mean). I hate the fact that I rely on hospital charity for serious conditions, but paying for health insurance simply is not worth it in my opinion. And in the opinion of the charity workers of the hospital, I do not make enough money to have to pay for health care.

I just do not understand why people argue so much about something as simple as a universal health care OPTION (this is not even something that is forced on you, it’s just an option). I wish, more than anything, that I could afford health care for not only myself, but my husband also. I feel as though we pay too much for health care we never use. I get dirty looks when I visit the doctor and tell them I don’t have health insurance, and even though I can pay for my visit, they still give me the look of someone who has stolen something.

This has gotten absolutely ridiculous. I have nurse friends who agree with me. I wish that I could encourage everyone to support some kind of health care for everyone, but I don’t think that will happen because some will “stick to their guns”. I just wish that those people could see the problem from my point of view or have the same issues I have. Then, perhaps, they would be willing to change their minds.

Related posts:
I don’t think I’ll ever fully understand the opposition to government health care
This Poll Was Not Taken In My Part of the Country

Tags: government, health insurance, mortgage payment