All Posts Tagged With: "public"


The Pitch – Would you be able to go without a car?

Jennifer McClelland | RSS | Fri, Sep 18 2009 | 0 Comments

traffic

Could you go without a car?

Question:

I’m sure the answer will be “I already do” or simply “Yes” if you live in a big city, but what about the suburbs or even rural areas? Could you go without a car?

Answer:

Ha. This one is pretty funny, after all, there was one point in time when cars didn’t exist. However, I have been without a car at one point in time and it was quite difficult to find a ride from place to place for the months I was without a car. I suppose what was even worse was being able to look at my car and know that I couldn’t use it (in the summer of 2006 my car was in the shop all summer and I wrecked it in September 2007).

Living in the “suburbs” of a small(er) city makes it extremely difficult to go without a car. I live 6 miles from the city and there aren’t any bicycle paths to get to and from the city, just a two lane highway (oh, the joys of living in Mississippi). There is a public transit system, but only within city limits.


Have an idea or want us to use your pitch in the next issue? Then, make a submission on The Pitch Page.

Related posts:
The Pitch – Would you be willing to shop for your prescriptions online?

Tags: , ,


In the long run, college will end up hurting your savings.

Jennifer McClelland | RSS | Mon, Jun 29 2009 | 2 Comments

It’s looking more and more that if you have discipline and want to save for the future, going to college may be a bad investment. A four year college degree costs too much and proves too little. It has become increasingly unlikely to be able to make up the cost of a college degree, even with the fact that college grads get paid more.

In an example for the New York Post as written by SmartMoney associate editor Jack Hough, if you look at two people from similar backgrounds each of whom save $16,594 for college. One decides to not go to college and invests his savings in a mutual fund that tracks the broad stock market. He ends up making an average pay that peaks at $32,538. He adds to his savings 5% of his after-tax income and it returns 8% a year.

His friend goes to college. He goes to public school and transfers to a private school. He ends up spending $48,286 in tuition and fees. These fees do not include room and board. He ends up spending $34,044 after grants. When he finishes school he owes $17,450 at 5% in student loans. He starts making just over $23,000 a year after taxes and peaks at almost $57K. Like his friend, he sets aside 5%. It will take him 12 years to pay off his loans. When he finally escapes from the debt at age 34, he starts investing in the same fund as his friend. He is able to make bigger monthly contributions. However, when they reach 65, the friend who didn’t go to college will have saved almost $1.3 million while the one with the degree will have less than a third of what his friend saved.

I believe that this all comes back to the fact that many people don’t think about saving rather they want to have a comfortable lifestyle while they can enjoy it. I’m not saying that you can’t enjoy things when you’re 65, but you can enjoy travel and have more ability to do so when you’re younger.

Related posts:
How college can negatively impact your retirement
The Five College Degrees you will see a good ROI on
College graduates are finding work in some fields

Tags: , ,


Is Twitter THIS necessary?

Jennifer McClelland | RSS | Sun, Mar 29 2009 | 3 Comments

Many people are Twitter-addicted. Twitter on the phone, Twitter on the computer, some Tweet in public…now OnStar may become Twitter equipped too??

Are we that obsessed with Twitter that we have to update while driving?

What will it say?

“TLI_Twitter is driving to school
less than 5 seconds ago from the car”

I am unsure about that, I know that Twitter is meant to tell everyone what you’re doing all the time, but is it so necessary to tell everyone when your driving or if you see someone on the road that drives you nuts?

“While in your vehicle, you can use OnStar to submit and retrieve tweets (messages) via your Twitter account. Using OnStar’s Voice-Activated Hands-Free Calling system, and having your voice converted into text, you can provide updates which would appear in the “What are you doing?” section of your Twitter homepage. It is also possible to listen to a tweet that was sent to you by someone else after it has been converted into voice. You can send and receive tweets without having to type or read anything.”

Source

Related posts:
Using Twitter as a marketing tool.
Google and Microsoft both have deals with Twitter?
Google wants to expand it’s Voice with a more viral approach

Tags: , ,


Google begins layoffs

Jennifer McClelland | RSS | Sun, Mar 29 2009 | 5 Comments

You know that times are tough when Google has to lay off workers. Google isn’t tied to newspapers that are hemorrhaging money, or financial services that are being blamed for the entire credit crisis…Google just wants to make sure its profit margins are protected and to cut back where it can.

It is actually only laying off less than 1% of its entire workforce.

Google’s fortunes are tied to ad spending that’s dwindling as both marketers and consumers squirrel away more cash. Although Google’s revenue has continued to rise during 15-month-old recession, some analysts say they believe the Mountain View-based company may finally be suffering its first quarter-to-quarter decline since it went public in 2004.

Internet advertisers aren’t paying as much for ads as they were a year ago so as the above paragraph says, Google isn’t making the same amount of money it once was.

Google is an internet giant. While it may make its money from ads, the numerous services it offers to customers could bring the company in extra money if they wanted to charge for them or add in features to pay for.

Source

Related posts:
Google and AT&T should kiss and make up
Google has to do something about this problem
Google wants to expand it’s Voice with a more viral approach

Tags: , ,


House kills dtv transition delay

Jennifer McClelland | RSS | Wed, Jan 28 2009 | 0 Comments

Even after the Senate voted in favor of passing the DTV transition delay, the House effectively killed it today.

The defeat was a setback for the Obama administration and Hill Democrats, who are concerned that too many Americans are not ready to get digital programming. House Republicans have argued that postponing the date would cause confusion for consumers and cost millions for broadcasters who have planned to make the transition.

The bill that came out of the Senate did not say how costs associated with postponing the date would be covered.

With only about 3 weeks left until the transition, Congress is running out of time if they really want this bill to pass.

Related posts:
How you can increase the value of your house in this market

Tags: , ,

XML Sitemap