All Posts Tagged With: "revenue"


Income Streams for Life

Michael Bowler | RSS | Thu, May 14 2009 | 5 Comments

moneytree

“Now his pension plan’s been cut in half and he can’t afford to die,” sings John Rich, of the country music duo Big & Rich, in his new, controversial song, Shutting Detroit Down. Two things nobody is ever financially ready for, especially if he or she is a money spender: retirement and death. Financially speaking, it is hard to die at the right time, unless you know much more than anyone else and can plan your death. People are so wrapped up in saving for retirement, 401k plans, life insurance plans, IRAs, money markets, or anything else they can find that will provide extra money for retirement and death. If you die too early, the paychecks your family was living off of are gone. If you die too late, you impoverish your family or confine yourself to an unpleasant local retirement home by depleting your savings.

One unexpected side effect of the recession is a jump in sales of fixed immediate annuities, which dispense guaranteed income for life. New York Life reported an 82% sales increase this quarter alone. A man at retirement age paying them $100,000 now will receive $650 a month for life, which is perfect for a retired man whose house and vehicle are paid off and bills are low. That’s equal to 7.8% of the total each year, double what most retirement investments pay out.

Christopher Blunt, who runs New York Life’s retirement division believes that annuities offer the best way to lock in guaranteed retirement income. Retirement income is  generated from a stock-and-bond portfolio requires keeping plenty of assets in reserve in case they’re needed to fund a long life or contend with a nasty bear market,” he says. The point is that you can get the same retirement income as you could from your portfolio, with 25% to 40% less principal.

The way they generate superior retirement income is by transferring it from those who do not collect it to those who do. For instance, if you pay them $100,000 and die three days later, your money is lost and goes to someone who is still collecting. However, if you live until you’re 85 and you have been collecting since you were 65, you have received $156,000 over the tenure of the relationship, over 50% profit. If you are lucky to live to 95, you have likely received $234,000, with a profit of nearly 150% of what you paid. For those who are healthy at 65, it is a good investment, especially if that person also has savings and stocks to tide over through bad times or to leave to their families. Assuming you are in good health, there are few downsides to a fixed annuity, especially if you keep your product features simple. You pay $100,000 of your savings to provide for the rest of your life. If you have been saving well for retirement, you likely still have $350,000 to leave to your family whether you collect or not.

Related posts:
Today’s Ebook – 401(k) Plans
Collecting on Life Insurance early could lead to the next financial meltdown
Today’s Ebook – Savings Fitness: A Guide to Your Money and Your Financial Future

Tags: , ,


Google begins layoffs

Jennifer McClelland | RSS | Sun, Mar 29 2009 | 5 Comments

You know that times are tough when Google has to lay off workers. Google isn’t tied to newspapers that are hemorrhaging money, or financial services that are being blamed for the entire credit crisis…Google just wants to make sure its profit margins are protected and to cut back where it can.

It is actually only laying off less than 1% of its entire workforce.

Google’s fortunes are tied to ad spending that’s dwindling as both marketers and consumers squirrel away more cash. Although Google’s revenue has continued to rise during 15-month-old recession, some analysts say they believe the Mountain View-based company may finally be suffering its first quarter-to-quarter decline since it went public in 2004.

Internet advertisers aren’t paying as much for ads as they were a year ago so as the above paragraph says, Google isn’t making the same amount of money it once was.

Google is an internet giant. While it may make its money from ads, the numerous services it offers to customers could bring the company in extra money if they wanted to charge for them or add in features to pay for.

Source

Related posts:
Google and AT&T should kiss and make up
Google has to do something about this problem
Google wants to expand it’s Voice with a more viral approach

Tags: , ,


Recycling hits bottom with the economic slow down

Jennifer McClelland | RSS | Sun, Dec 07 2008 | 0 Comments

Last year and even into the summer of this year metal prices were at all time highs. Recycling metals was so profitable that new laws and regulations were set in place by state governments to require identification (and sometimes waiting periods) for people who were bringing in recyclable metals to facilities. The laws were put into place to deter people from stealing wires and other metals. There was a news report out of Memphis that thieves were taking copper wire from air conditioners from churches.

Now, the price of scrap metal and other recyclables has fallen dramatically. Most metals have fallen equally (sometimes more) with the price of oil. The drop in prices has caused recycling facilities to cut jobs just because they can’t get the same revenue as they used to. Some people aren’t recycling as much either. Several cities that have started curbside recycling are scaling back.

The real loser in the price drop is the environment. When prices were up, people were more inclined to recycle because of the money they could get. Also, at the time recyclable materials prices were up, gas prices were up and consumers were becoming more environmentally conscious…now, with gas prices and other commodity prices down, awareness has also taken a hit.

Related posts:
For less than $200,000 you can buy a business in Memphis
DVDs are the next target of the “price war”

Tags: , ,


Sprint posts another loss. Customers are nowhere to be found?

Jennifer McClelland | RSS | Fri, Nov 07 2008 | 0 Comments

Sprint posted a $326 million loss today and a 12% drop in revenue for the 3rd quarter. It also lost 1.1 million customers in the 3rd quarter, analysts were only expecting 1 million post paid customers to drop.

So what’s wrong with Sprint?

As a Sprint subscriber (yes, I know. I should probably go into hiding for admitting that now), I am disappointed with the marketing tactics used. Sure, maybe in political advertising attacking your opponent doesn’t work, but when you’re trying to gain some market share in the cellular industry, sometimes you have to point out every weakness of your competitor. Look at Verizon…they are one of the top 2 cellular companies in the US, and their ads are specifically targeting Sprint. Poor little Sprint :( Why wouldn’t Verizon pick on At&t? Well, I believe that Verizon is trying to move as many CDMA (At&t is GSM) customers to its side as possible…

If Verizon Wireless can put Sprint out of business, that is one less carrier it will have to compete with.

I think Sprint can make a comeback. Hopefully.

Related posts:
Sprint lost nearly half a billion dollars in the third quarter
Could we be seeing the end of AT&T and iPhone exclusivity?

Tags: , ,

XML Sitemap